Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci (CNS)

Glosa do wyroku Sądu Administracyjnego w Warszawie z 9 listopada 2012 r., sygn. II AK a 283/12

  1. Adam Wróbel

Abstract

GLOSS TO THE JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL IN WARSAW FROM 9 NO VEMBER 2012, SI GN. II AKA 283/12

The author agrees with the analysed point of view of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw. He shares the views — expressed in the thesis of this judgement — that: a) the provision of Art. 158 § 2 C.C., which specifies the intentional crime of brawl or beating with unintentional consequence in the form of grievous bodily harm, cannot be in coincidence (real, relevant) with the provision of Art. 156 § 1 C.C., which specifies the intentional crime of causing grievous bodily harm — because of the homogeneous, intentional subjective side of both these provisions; b) for the identification and assumption of criminal intention of a direct perpetrator irrelevant are the assessments in the scope of subjective side of an offence committed by a direct perpetrator — because both subjective sides are independent of each other.

Pobierz artykuł

Ten artykuł

Przegląd Prawa i Administracji

97, 2014

Strony od 147 do 151

Inne artykuły autorów

Google Scholar

zamknij

Twoj koszyk (produkty: 0)

Brak produktów w koszyku

Twój koszyk Do kasy